Rideshare Accidents Texas Insurance Law Updated June 2026 · TX 14 min read

Texas Rideshare Insurance: who pays after an Uber or Lyft crash

Written for Texans hurt in an Uber or Lyft. You are staring at a claim number. You are wondering whose insurance even applies. In Texas the answer turns on one thing. What was the app doing the second the crash happened? This guide walks through HB 1733. That bill passed in 2015. It now lives in Insurance Code Chapter 1954. It also shows how Uber and Lyft’s 2026 coverage works with UM/UIM and PIP under Chapter 1952.

Texas rideshare insurance coverage after an Uber or Lyft accident

Most guides tell you Uber and Lyft carry a million dollar policy. Then they stop. That is true for part of a trip. It is wrong for the rest of it. The same crash can be covered three ways. It might be a $1,000,000 commercial policy, a smaller $50,000 contingent policy, or only the driver’s personal auto insurance. Which one applies comes down to one question. Was the app off? Was it on and waiting? Or was the driver carrying a ride at impact?

That question decides almost everything. Get it wrong and you chase the wrong insurer for months. Get it right and you know the coverage on day one. The plain answers below come from the Texas statute, Insurance Code Chapter 1954. They also come from how Uber and Lyft build their policies. We left the sales pitch out. You have enough going on.

Before you read on This page is general information. It does not create an attorney client relationship. It is not legal advice for your crash. Coverage turns on the facts of your accident, your injuries, and the policies in force. Is an Uber, Lyft, or insurance company telling you no one is responsible? Talk to a licensed Texas attorney before you accept that.

The quick version, if you read nothing else

  • Coverage follows the app, not the driver. What the driver’s app was doing at the moment of impact decides which policy pays.
  • The number climbs with the period. App off is the driver’s own 30/60/25. App on and waiting is 50/100/25. A ride accepted unlocks a $1,000,000 policy.
  • The proof lives on Uber and Lyft servers. The trip status at impact can be requested, and subpoenaed when a claim is in dispute.
  • UM/UIM and PIP are a hidden second layer. Both ride along automatically unless a named insured rejected them in writing.
  • The law is HB 1733, effective 2016 and codified in Insurance Code Chapter 1954.

Coverage follows the app, not the driver

When you picture rideshare insurance, you probably picture one big policy. It flips on when someone opens the Uber or Lyft driver app. It does not work that way in Texas. The law splits a driver’s time into stages. Each stage has its own layer of coverage.

Texas names these stages by what the driver is doing. Most people call them the periods. The app can be off. It can be on with the driver waiting for a ride. Or matched, heading to a pickup or carrying a passenger. Coverage climbs sharply as you move up.

None of that is a loophole. It is in the statute. The insurer rarely tells you which period applied to your crash. That period decides how much money is on the table. The rest of this page walks the periods, the law behind them, and where claims fall through the cracks.

The question

Which insurance actually covers an Uber or Lyft crash?

Straight answer: It depends on the period. With the app off, only the driver’s personal auto policy applies. That is the Texas minimum of 30/60/25. With the app on but no ride accepted, a contingent layer of 50/100/25 applies under Insurance Code 1954.052. Once a ride is accepted, a $1,000,000 policy applies under 1954.053. That holds whether the driver is heading to the pickup or carrying a passenger. Same driver, very different coverage.

Here is the part the claims line will not spell out. The size of the policy is set the instant the crash happens. It is set by what the driver’s app was doing. So the first thing a careful lawyer asks is not “how bad are your injuries.” It is “what was the driver doing on the app?”

The four periods of Texas rideshare coverage Source: Tex. Ins. Code Ch. 1954; Transp. Code Ch. 601
Period App status Policy that pays Minimum coverage
0 App off; driving personally Driver’s personal auto 30/60/25
1 App on, waiting for a request Driver’s policy, plus TNC contingent layer 50/100/25 + UM/UIM + PIP
2 Matched, driving to the pickup Uber or Lyft commercial policy $1,000,000 + UM/UIM + PIP
3 Passenger in the car Uber or Lyft commercial policy $1,000,000 + UM/UIM + PIP
From inside the file The single most valuable fact in a rideshare claim is the trip status at impact. The proof of it lives on Uber’s and Lyft’s servers, not in your phone. That data can be requested. When a claim is in dispute, it can be subpoenaed. Insurers know most people never ask for it. So a driver who was matched with a rider sometimes gets reported as merely “logged on.” That difference can be the gap between a 50/100/25 policy and a million dollar one.
$1M
TNC liability once a ride is accepted (1954.053)
50/100
Liability while the app is on and waiting (1954.052)
2016
Year the Texas TNC insurance law took effect
2 yrs
To file most injury suits in Texas

How to pin down the period

You do not need to be a lawyer to start protecting this fact. Note whether you were a passenger, another driver, or a pedestrian. Were you the rider? Your trip receipt and app history show the ride was active. Were you hit by a rideshare driver? Write down the driver’s name and the company. Note anything they said about a passenger, or about heading to one. Photograph the car, the rideshare decal, and the scene. That early record matters. It keeps an insurer from quietly downgrading your crash to a cheaper period later. You can also check your own crash against the four periods with our rideshare coverage tool.

The question

What did HB 1733 actually change?

Straight answer: Before 2016, Texas had no statewide rule on this. Nothing forced rideshare companies to carry insurance during the gap when a driver was logged on but had no passenger. HB 1733 closed that gap. The 84th Legislature passed it in 2015. It took effect January 1, 2016. It added Chapter 1954 to the Insurance Code. It set the period based coverage Uber and Lyft must carry across the state.

For a few years, the dangerous moment in a rideshare trip was the waiting period. A driver had the app on but no ride yet. That driver could fall into a gap. Their personal insurer might deny the claim as commercial use. And no statewide rule made the company fill it. HB 1733 settled that argument in Texas.

Representative Smithee authored the bill, enacted in 2015. It created Insurance Code Chapter 1954. It tied coverage to the periods, not to the company’s goodwill. Two sections do the heavy lifting. They are worth knowing by name.

The two sections that set rideshare coverage Source: Tex. Ins. Code §§ 1954.052, 1954.053
Statute When it applies What it requires
§ 1954.052 App on, logged in, no ride accepted 50/100/25 liability, plus UM/UIM and PIP where required
§ 1954.053 Driver matched and engaged in a prearranged ride $1,000,000 aggregate liability, plus UM/UIM and PIP where required

You can read the official text straight from the state. It is on the Texas Legislature site at statutes.capitol.texas.gov. The waiting period sits in Section 1954.052. Active rides sit in Section 1954.053. Want plain language guidance on personal auto and rideshare policies? The Texas Department of Insurance is the state regulator.

One more section protects you when a driver’s own coverage is not enough. Look at § 1954.054. Say the driver’s policy has lapsed. Or say it does not provide what the chapter requires. Then the rideshare company must step in and cover the claim from the first dollar. In plain terms, Uber or Lyft cannot point at a driver’s empty personal policy and walk away. Not during a covered period.

The question

What if UM/UIM or PIP was rejected in writing?

Straight answer: These two coverages are the hidden levers in a rideshare claim. They only fall away if someone signed them off. Under Texas Insurance Code 1952.101, uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage must be included. The one exception is a named insured who rejected it in writing. Under Section 1952.152, personal injury protection, or PIP, of at least $2,500 must be included. The same exception applies. Does that rejection exist? Who signed it? The answer can decide whether there is a second source of money for your injuries.

Most coverage maps stop at the liability number. The recovery often lives one layer deeper. UM/UIM coverage pays when the at fault driver has no insurance. It also pays when they do not have enough. That matters constantly in Texas, where minimum policies are thin. PIP pays your early medical bills. It also pays a share of lost wages, no matter who was at fault.

The statute makes both of these the default. They ride along with the policy on their own. The one exception is a named insured who signed a written rejection. That word “written” is the lever. A spoken “I don’t need that” does not count. The carrier has to produce the signed waiver. When it cannot, the coverage is still there. It stays there even if the adjuster talks as though it is gone.

A representative example Picture a passenger hurt in a Lyft when an uninsured driver runs a light. The Lyft commercial policy responds. But the medical bills run past it. The next question is whether UM/UIM applies. The passenger’s own auto policy may add a layer. Unless that passenger signed a written rejection of UM/UIM, the coverage is in play and stacks on top. Confirming that waiver does not exist is the kind of paperwork review that changes a recovery. This shows how the layers work. It is not an actual case or a predicted result.

How you protect these levers. Do not assume UM/UIM or PIP is gone just because an adjuster says so. Ask, in writing, for a copy of any signed rejection. Pull your own auto policy. Check whether you ever waived UM/UIM. As an injured rider or pedestrian, your personal coverage can come into play. Our Texas uninsured motorist lawyers deal with these stacked layers constantly. Finding a second policy is often the difference between a claim that covers your care and one that does not.

  1. Ask each insurer for the signed rejection In writing, request a copy of any UM/UIM or PIP waiver. If the carrier cannot produce a signed rejection, the coverage is still in force.
  2. Map which policies you are an insured under As an injured rider, another driver, or even a pedestrian, you may be covered under your own auto policy, a household member’s policy, and the rideshare policy at once.
  3. Check where the UM/UIM actually sits Confirm whether the rideshare policy itself carries UM/UIM, or whether only a personal policy does. The answer decides which carrier you pursue, and in what order.
Free consultation · No fee unless we win

Not sure which policy covers your crash?

Tell us what the driver was doing. We will tell you where the coverage is. No cost, no obligation. Se habla español.

What Uber and Lyft’s coverage actually looks like

Uber and Lyft both advertise the headline number. It is up to $1,000,000 while a driver is on a trip. The friction lives in the layers around it.

The waiting period is smaller than people think. In Period 1 the app is on but no ride is accepted. The contingent coverage tracks 50/100/25, not the million dollar figure. People assume the big policy is live at that point. It is not.

Physical damage carries a deductible. Coverage for the driver’s own vehicle is usually contingent, and the driver absorbs the deductible. The current policy sets the exact figure. The carrier issued certificate controls. Do not treat a screenshot as the final word.

“Contingent” means it sits behind something. Several layers only pay after the driver’s insurer has been asked or has declined. That is where delay creeps in. Knowing the order keeps a claim from stalling between two companies.

A note on the numbers Coverage limits below the statutory minimums are not legal in Texas. But carriers can and do adjust the details above the floor over time. They also revise their certificates of insurance. Treat any specific deductible or sub limit as a starting point. Verify it against the policy in force for your crash. It is not a permanent fact.
From the other side of the table “I spent more than a decade directing insurance litigation for a 10 state region of one of the country’s largest auto insurers. When a rideshare claim comes in, the first move is almost always to question the period; was the driver actually on a trip, or just logged on? Pin it to the cheaper period and the whole claim shrinks. I helped build those arguments, so I know how to take them apart. The trip data does not lie, and I know exactly where to make them produce it. That knowledge does not switch off when you change sides. It just changes hands.”
Matthew Graham · Managing Litigation Attorney

The headline says a million dollars. Whether you ever see it depends on a single fact. It is a fact the insurer would rather not confirm.

When three insurers are on the hook, who pays first?

A serious rideshare crash can put three policies in play. The order they pay in is set, not random.

During a covered period, the TNC commercial policy is primary. It pays first, up to its limit. The driver’s personal policy sits behind it. That policy often excludes the crash during rideshare use.

Say another driver caused the crash and carried too little coverage. Then your UM or UIM steps in next. That layer can come from the rideshare policy or your own. The period decides which.

Who can file a claim More people than the passenger. An injured rider, another driver, a pedestrian, or a cyclist can each file a claim against the policy that a covered period unlocks. Who is eligible does not turn on who booked the ride. It turns on who was hurt.

The same crash, four different answers

The law is easier to hold onto through actual situations. Here is how coverage shifts across the most common Texas rideshare crashes. Each one turns on that same question about the app.

  1. You were a passenger in an Uber or Lyft The driver is on an active trip, so Period 3 applies and the $1,000,000 commercial policy is primary under 1954.053. If a third driver caused the wreck and was uninsured, UM/UIM becomes the next lever, sometimes through the rideshare policy and sometimes through your own.
  2. A rideshare driver hit your car while carrying a passenger Same Period 3 coverage; the company’s million dollar policy responds to your injuries and property damage. The key is proving the driver was on a trip, which the trip data establishes.
  3. A driver hit you while logged on but waiting for a ride This is Period 1. The contingent 50/100/25 layer under 1954.052 applies, which is far smaller than the trip policy. If your damages exceed it, UM/UIM on your own policy may fill the gap.
  4. The driver’s app was off entirely Then it is an ordinary car accident; only the driver’s personal auto policy applies at 30/60/25, and Uber or Lyft owe nothing. This is the version insurers push hardest, which is why the app status has to be confirmed, not assumed.

The thread through all four is the same. The injuries can be identical. The coverage is not. It is set by a fact you can establish early, if you know to look for it. Was your crash a rideshare wreck? Our Texas rideshare accident lawyers can pull the trip data and map the layers for you. And our broader Texas car accident team handles the cases that turn out to be ordinary collisions.

What a rideshare claim can actually recover

Is there an average rideshare settlement?

Not one worth trusting. The period sets the policy limit, and the limit sets the ceiling. So a Period 1 claim and a Period 3 claim with the same injury can land far apart. The number tracks the coverage the period unlocks, not a statewide average.

The available policy sets the ceiling. Within it you can claim more than the hospital bill: your past and future medical care, lost income and earning capacity, property damage, and pain and suffering. What those add up to depends on your injuries, and on which period, and so which policy, applies. For a sense of the range in an ordinary collision, see what car accident claims tend to be worth in Texas. A rideshare crash with a million dollar policy can reach further, but only up to the limit the period unlocks.

The same injury, priced by the period

The contrast is the whole point. Take the same neck injury. In a Period 1 crash, only the 50/100/25 contingent layer may apply. In a Period 3 crash, a $1,000,000 policy plus UM/UIM stands behind it. The injury did not change. The coverage did. That is why the period gets nailed down early.

One caution on timing. Be wary of a fast settlement within days of a crash. Speed usually means your doctors do not yet know the full injury. You cannot value what you cannot yet see.

How long does a Texas rideshare accident claim take?

A rideshare accident claim can take a few months to a few years to settle. The time depends on your injuries and the fight over coverage.

A claim with clear liability can close in a few months. Fault is not in doubt. The injury is minor.

A disputed period or a serious injury takes longer. These claims often run 9 months to 2 years or more. So a typical rideshare settlement lands somewhere in that window, set by the injury and the coverage fight.

Why rideshare adds time

A normal crash has two drivers and two insurers. A rideshare crash has more moving parts.

First, someone must pull the trip data from Uber or Lyft. That request takes time.

Second, more than one insurer may be on the hook. The driver has a personal carrier. The TNC has a commercial carrier. A third driver may have one too.

Third, the insurers fight over which period applied. The period sets the coverage limit, so the stakes are high.

How long does Uber or Lyft take to investigate?

Usually a few weeks to a few months. The insurer’s own investigation adds that time. Uber and Lyft claims run through a third party administrator. It reviews the trip data, the police report, and your medical records before it makes an offer.

Extra step Uber and Lyft do not handle claims in house. They use a third party administrator, or TPA. Your uber accident claim goes through this middle company, which adds a step and some delay.

Can you sue Uber or Lyft, or just their insurer?

In most Texas cases, you file a claim against the insurance policy. You do not sue Uber or Lyft as a company.

Here is why. Rideshare drivers are independent contractors. They are not employees of Uber or Lyft.

In Texas, a company is usually not liable for the acts of a contractor. So Uber and Lyft are hard to name for a driver’s mistake.

You can still sue the driver who caused the crash. That is the key move. When you sue that driver, the commercial policy responds.

The independent contractor rule rarely blocks recovery. The $1,000,000 policy still covers a covered period. The money is there even if the company name is not on the suit.

The mechanism Who pays for an uber accident is the insurer, not the app maker. When you file a claim against Uber, you are claiming on the policy that covers the driver.

How do you file a claim after an Uber or Lyft crash?

File your rideshare accident claim in a clear set of steps. Move fast, and keep your proof.

  1. Report the crash in the app. Open Uber or Lyft and report it. Save the trip receipt.
  2. Get the police report and care. Call the police. See a doctor, even if you feel fine.
  3. Report to both insurers. Tell the TNC’s insurer and your own carrier about the crash.
  4. Preserve the trip data. Keep the receipt and any proof of which period applied.
  5. Guard your words. Do not give a recorded statement. Do not accept a fast offer before you know your injuries.
Why it matters A lyft accident claim rises or falls on the period proof. The trip data shows if the app was on and if a ride was accepted. That fact sets the coverage limit.

What evidence do you need to sue Uber or Lyft?

Five things carry a rideshare case. The trip data that proves the period. The police report. Your medical records. Photos of the scene and the vehicles. And the names of any witnesses. The trip data is the one only Uber or Lyft holds, so a lawyer requests it first.

Does Uber or Lyft settle out of court?

Yes. Most rideshare injury claims settle without a lawsuit. A trial is rare.

The reason is money and risk. The insurer would rather pay within the $1,000,000 policy than risk a trial. A jury could award more.

A lawsuit gets filed for two main reasons. The period is disputed, or the offer is too low.

Filing suit often moves a stalled claim. A set trial date can push a fair uber accident settlement. Many cases still settle after the suit is filed.

The deadline that can end a claim early

Texas gives you two years to file most injury suits. The clock runs from the date of the crash. Miss it and even a strong claim is worth nothing.

One situation cuts the time far shorter. Was the other vehicle a city bus or a government car? Then a separate notice deadline can run in a matter of months, long before the two year mark.

The proof fades too. The trip data and the period record are easiest to pull early. A claim confirmed soon is a claim you can still prove.

Do you even need a lawyer for this?

The plain answer: not always. Say you were a passenger in a minor fender bump. You walked away without injury. And the trip period is not in question. You can often handle that yourself.

It is a different story once an injury is serious or the period is disputed. Rideshare claims pull in more parties than a normal wreck. There is the driver, the company, the commercial insurer, the driver’s own insurer, and sometimes a third driver. Each one has a reason to point at the others. Consider a lawyer if you were hurt. Consider one if the app status is disputed, the offer is low, or insurers keep passing you back and forth. Most Texas injury lawyers, including ours, work on contingency. No fee up front. The fee comes out of the recovery, not your pocket.

For lawyers and insurance professionals The Texas rideshare insurance framework in one place, with links to the official text:
  • Ins. Code § 1954.052; logged on, no ride accepted, 50/100/25 plus UM/UIM and PIP where required.
  • Ins. Code § 1954.053; engaged in a prearranged ride, $1,000,000 aggregate plus UM/UIM and PIP where required.
  • Ins. Code § 1954.054; TNC covers from the first dollar when the driver’s policy has lapsed or is insufficient.
  • Ins. Code § 1952.101; UM/UIM included unless rejected in writing by a named insured.
  • Ins. Code § 1952.152; PIP of at least $2,500 included unless rejected in writing.
  • Tex. Transp. Code Ch. 601; personal auto minimum financial responsibility of 30/60/25 (Period 0).
  • Framework added by HB 1733, 84th Leg., R.S. (2015), effective January 1, 2016; definitions later amended by HB 2501 (85th Leg., 2017).

What pushing back has looked like here

A rideshare crash is, in the end, a motor vehicle claim against an insurance company. It is the kind of case J. Alexander Law handles every day. Below are actual results from motor vehicle and commercial vehicle claims the firm has resolved. That includes wrongful death matters. You can see more of our results for the full picture. These are actual results, not a promise. We share them so you can see what the work can produce. They are not a figure to expect.

Selected resolved motor vehicle claims J. Alexander Law Firm
Case type Result
Motor vehicle accident, 18 wheeler, wrongful death$15,000,000
Motor vehicle accident, 18 wheeler, wrongful death$2,550,000
Motor vehicle accident$1,000,000
Motor vehicle accident$716,000
Motor vehicle accident$350,000
Required disclaimer These are actual outcomes in specific cases; they are not a prediction. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Every claim depends on its own facts, injuries, and the insurance coverage available.

“They took the time to answer all of my questions and made me feel confident in them. All the staff has been friendly and professional.”

Verified client review · Cecilia G.

Individual results and experiences vary. This review reflects one client’s experience and is not a guarantee of future results.

Josh Alexander, founder of J. Alexander Law Firm

A rideshare company will tell you which period applied. They will tell it in the way that costs them the least. My job is to make them prove it with the trip data, not the talking point. And to find every layer of coverage that belongs to your claim. You do not pay me a dollar unless I win. That is the only way I have ever done this.

Josh Alexander

Founder · J. Alexander Law Firm

Reading this against your own crash.

Everything above describes how rideshare coverage works in general. It does not describe your accident. The gap between the two is where most people get stuck. A quick call usually clears it up fastest. Here are the situations we hear about most.

Common gaps between this guide & your situation
You said
“The Uber driver says they didn’t have a passenger yet.”
What to do
Do not take that as settled. Ask that the trip data be preserved; it shows whether a ride was accepted, which sets the coverage.
Why
“Logged on” caps coverage at 50/100/25; “on a trip” unlocks the $1,000,000 policy. The data, not the driver’s memory, decides it.
You said
“Uber’s insurer says their policy doesn’t apply to me.”
What to do
Get the reason in writing and pin down the period. If a ride was active, 1954.053 puts a million dollar policy in play.
Why
A denial is a position, not a fact. The statute, plus the trip status, controls whether the company owes your claim.
You said
“The driver who hit me had no insurance at all.”
What to do
Look for UM/UIM, on the rideshare policy and on your own, and ask for any signed rejection before accepting that it is gone.
Why
Under 1952.101 UM/UIM rides along unless rejected in writing, so it is often still there when an adjuster implies it is not.
You said
“Two insurance companies keep sending me to each other.”
What to do
Document each handoff with dates and names; the contingent order is set by the policies and the statute, not by whoever answers.
Why
Passing you back and forth is a delay tactic. A clear record of who said what, when, is what forces a decision.
You said
“They offered me a settlement just days after the crash.”
What to do
Do not sign yet. A fast offer usually lands before you, or your doctors, know the full extent of the injury.
Why
Settling early lets the company close your file cheaply, before the value of your injury is actually known.
You said
“It has been a while since my rideshare accident.”
What to do
Confirm your deadline now. Texas generally allows two years, but a claim touching a government vehicle can be far shorter.
Why
A missed statute of limitations ends the claim permanently, no matter how strong the coverage was.

Texas rideshare insurance: quick answers

Does Uber or Lyft insurance cover me in a Texas accident?

It depends on what the driver’s app was doing at the moment of the crash. Had the driver accepted a ride, or had a passenger? Then a $1,000,000 commercial policy applies under Insurance Code 1954.053. Was the app on but no ride accepted? Then a smaller 50/100/25 contingent layer applies under 1954.052. Was the app off? Then only the driver’s personal auto insurance applies. Call us. We can tell you which period, and which policy, fits your crash.

How much insurance do Uber and Lyft carry in Texas?

Up to $1,000,000 in liability while a driver is engaged in a prearranged ride. That is set by Insurance Code 1954.053. During the waiting period, the app is on but no ride is accepted. Then the required coverage drops to 50/100/25 under 1954.052. The headline million dollar figure does not apply to every moment a driver is online. That is a common and costly misunderstanding.

What is HB 1733, and how does it relate to Texas Insurance Code Chapter 1954?

HB 1733 is the Texas bill that created the statewide rideshare insurance framework. The 84th Legislature passed it in 2015. It took effect January 1, 2016, adding Chapter 1954 to the Insurance Code. A later 2017 bill, HB 2501, updated some of the chapter’s definitions. Chapter 1954 is where the period based coverage lives. That includes the 50/100/25 requirement in 1954.052 and the $1,000,000 requirement in 1954.053. Trying to figure out which version applied to your crash? Call us and we will sort it out.

What if the rideshare driver’s app was off when they hit me?

Then it is treated as an ordinary car accident. Only the driver’s personal auto policy applies, at the Texas minimum of 30/60/25. Uber and Lyft generally owe nothing once the app is off. This is the cheapest outcome for the company. So the app status should be confirmed through trip data, not taken on the driver’s word. We can help request that data.

I was a passenger in an Uber that crashed; who pays my medical bills?

As a passenger you are almost always in Period 3, the active trip. So the $1,000,000 commercial policy under 1954.053 is primary. Did another driver cause the wreck and carry no insurance? Then uninsured motorist coverage becomes the next source. That can be through the rideshare policy or through your own auto policy. You did nothing wrong as a rider. Do not let an insurer treat your claim as a gray area. Talk to a lawyer before you settle.

What does “UM/UIM rejected in writing” mean for my claim?

Under Insurance Code 1952.101, uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage is included on its own. The one exception is a named insured who signed a written rejection. If no signed waiver exists, the coverage is still in force. That holds even when an adjuster suggests otherwise. UM/UIM is often the second source of money after a low at fault policy. So ask the insurer to produce that signed rejection before you accept that it is gone.

Does Texas PIP cover me after a rideshare crash?

Often yes. Personal injury protection of at least $2,500 must be included in a Texas auto policy under Insurance Code 1952.152. The one exception is a policy where it was rejected in writing. PIP pays early medical bills and a portion of lost wages, no matter who was at fault. During a covered rideshare period, PIP is among the coverages the statute pulls in. Check both the rideshare policy and your own for a PIP layer.

Is UM/UIM required in Texas under Insurance Code 1952.101?

Effectively yes, unless you waived it. Under Insurance Code 1952.101, uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage must be included in a Texas auto policy. The one exception is a named insured who rejects it in writing. There is no blanket exemption for rideshare. The same rule reaches the coverages the rideshare statute pulls in. Were you hurt by a driver with no insurance or not enough? Ask whether a signed UM/UIM rejection exists before you accept that there is no coverage.

Is PIP required in Texas under Insurance Code 1952.152?

PIP must be offered and is included by default. Under Insurance Code 1952.152, personal injury protection of at least $2,500 must be part of a Texas auto policy. The one exception is a named insured who rejected it in writing. PIP pays early medical bills and a portion of lost wages, no matter who was at fault. That makes it useful right after a rideshare crash, while liability is still being sorted out. Check both your own policy and any rideshare policy for a PIP layer.

The Uber driver only had Period 1 coverage; is 50/100/25 enough?

Frequently it is not, especially with a serious injury. The 50/100/25 contingent layer under 1954.052 is far smaller than the trip policy. A serious injury can exceed it quickly. When it does, look for more coverage. That might be UM/UIM on your own policy. It might be a dispute over whether the driver had in fact accepted a ride. A lawyer can map every layer that might apply.

Do I need a lawyer for an Uber or Lyft accident in Texas?

Not for a minor bump with no injury and no dispute about the period. You likely do once an injury is involved. You likely do once the period is contested. And you likely do once two insurers are passing you back and forth. J. Alexander Law works on contingency. The consultation is free. There is no fee up front. You pay nothing unless we recover money for you. You do not pay us. They do, when we win.

It’s personal. Because to us, it is.

If you take one thing from this page, take this. In a Texas rideshare crash, the coverage follows the app. And the company has every reason to describe that fact in the way that costs it the least. You now know the periods and the statute behind them. You know the UM/UIM and PIP layers the headline number leaves out. That is the difference between accepting whatever an insurer tells you and knowing where the money should be.

You should not have to argue period definitions with a billion dollar company while you are trying to heal. One call sets up a free review, in English or Spanish. No cost, no pressure. We will tell you straight where your claim stands.

24/7 · Free consultation · No fee unless we win

Hurt in an Uber or Lyft? Talk to a Texas rideshare accident lawyer today.

Dallas · Houston · San Antonio · Fort Worth · Canton · Oklahoma City. Se habla español.

The information on this page is for general information purposes only and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney client relationship. Statutory coverage requirements are summarized in plain terms and have exceptions; how they apply depends on your specific crash and the policies in force. Carrier coverage details can change over time, and the certificate of insurance in effect for your accident controls. Every case is different and turns on its own facts. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.