$600,000 Settlement After Five Vehicle Commercial Crash in Rockwall County

The Result

Our client was stopped in northbound traffic on State Highway 205 in McLendon Chisholm when a commercial driver working for a restoration company failed to control speed and struck the rear of her vehicle. The impact pushed her into the vehicle ahead and then forced her into oncoming traffic, where another vehicle struck her head on. In seconds, a stopped traffic rear end collision became a five vehicle chain reaction crash involving multiple impacts, severe vehicle damage, deployed airbags, and emergency removal from the wrecked vehicle.

She could not get out of her vehicle on her own. EMS personnel used a scoop stretcher to remove her and transported her by ambulance for emergency treatment. She spent 12 days in the hospital, underwent surgery the next day for a shattered left ankle and extensively comminuted fibula fracture, and then required inpatient rehabilitation, a wheelchair, a cast, a walking boot, a knee scooter, and a gradual return to weight bearing. Through litigation, detailed case development, and continued negotiations, Attorney Laura Rivas secured a $600,000 settlement.

The Crash

Where It Happened

The collision occurred on Tuesday, October 15, 2024, on northbound State Highway 205 in McLendon Chisholm, Rockwall County, Texas. The crash involved five vehicles. Our client was stopped in traffic when the commercial driver behind her failed to control speed. The Texas Peace Officer's Crash Report also identified distraction as a possible contributing factor.

How the Chain Reaction Began

1. Impact 1The commercial driver rear ended our client's stopped vehicle.
2. Impact 2The force of that rear impact pushed her into the vehicle directly ahead.
3. Impact 3Her vehicle was then forced into the southbound lane, where another vehicle struck it head on.

Emergency Response

The collision severely damaged the client's vehicle, which was declared a total loss. Crash scene photographs documented severe front and passenger side damage, a shattered windshield, law enforcement response, and EMS at the scene. Front and side airbags deployed.

Although the client was alert when EMS arrived, with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15, she could not get out of the vehicle without help and reported significant left hip and left ankle pain. First responders used a scoop stretcher to remove her before ambulance transport to the hospital.

Hospital Care

Twelve Day Hospital Stay

The client was hospitalized from October 15 through October 27, 2024. Her injuries were not limited to soreness or short term soft tissue symptoms.

She also developed anemia during hospitalization associated with her fracture injuries, as well as temporary electrolyte and blood count complications that required treatment and monitoring.

Surgery the Next Day

After surgery, she could not bear weight on her left leg. Her right elbow fracture also complicated her ability to move and care for herself independently. Because of the lumbar spine fractures, she was instructed to wear an LSO back brace whenever she was out of bed for six to eight weeks. She left the hospital with pain medication, muscle relaxants, a wheelchair, and strict weight bearing restrictions.

Rehabilitation and Recovery

Inpatient Rehabilitation

After leaving the acute hospital, the client transferred to inpatient rehabilitation from October 27 through November 2, 2024. She received physical therapy, occupational therapy, pain management, and support for impaired mobility and reduced ability to manage daily self care. She was discharged with a lightweight wheelchair rental.

Cast, Walking Boot, and Knee Scooter

1. First ankle follow upAt the first ankle follow up, the incisions were healing and the surgical hardware remained stable. Her sutures were removed, she was placed in a short leg cast, and she remained non weight bearing.
2. Elbow follow upAt her elbow follow up, the fracture was healing without displacement, but she continued to experience mild stiffness and required therapy.
3. Six week ankle follow upAt the six week ankle follow up, the alignment and hardware remained intact, but the client reported reduced sensation on the top and bottom of her foot and into her calf. She transitioned to a tall walking boot, remained non weight bearing for two additional weeks, and then began a gradual return to weight bearing through therapy.

Spine Injuries and Future Care

Lumbar Fractures

The hospital documented fractures in the client's lower back, including left L4 and L5 transverse process fractures and a small nondisplaced L4 vertebral body fracture. The hospital records described the fractures as stable, without spinal canal narrowing, but the client still required a back brace and continuing medical care during her recovery.

Neck Findings and Future Treatment

A cervical MRI documented a C5-6 disc herniation with disc height loss and bone spurs causing mild canal narrowing. During the hospital course, the neurosurgeon described the cervical disc bulge as chronic and recommended conservative management at that stage.

After her initial hospital stay and inpatient rehabilitation, the client continued treating for ongoing neck and low back symptoms. Her care included follow up evaluations, pain management treatment, and recommendations for additional procedures intended to address continuing pain and functional limitations. The litigation team documented those continuing needs as part of the full damages picture while the case remained in litigation.

Scarring and Daily Impact

Surgical Scars and Mobility Loss

The ankle surgery left scars along the outer ankle and heel. Post crash photographs documented swelling, bruising, surgical wrapping, a long stitched incision, lingering discoloration, and the client's use of a walking boot and knee scooter. The litigation demand included claims for permanent scarring and disfigurement involving the ankle, foot, and leg.

More Than Medical Bills

The crash changed the client's ability to move independently and manage her own daily care.

The demand sought damages for:

• Medical expenses
• Pain
• Mental anguish
• Physical impairment
• Disfigurement
• Lost independence
• Continuing treatment needs

Litigation and Resolution

Building the Commercial Case

Attorney Laura Rivas handled this matter through litigation. The crash report provided an important starting point, but the case required far more than showing that the commercial driver failed to control speed.

The legal team developed the complete story of what happened after the initial impact. Our client was stopped in northbound SH 205 traffic when the commercial driver struck her from behind. The force pushed her into the vehicle ahead and then into oncoming traffic, where another vehicle struck her head on. The collision became a five vehicle chain reaction that left her unable to get out of her vehicle without EMS assistance.

The firm built the claim using:

1. 01The certified crash report
2. 02Crash scene evidence
3. 03EMS documentation
4. 04Hospital records
5. 05Diagnostic imaging
6. 06Ankle surgery records
7. 07Inpatient rehabilitation records
8. 08Orthopedic follow up
9. 09Medical billing
10. 10Evidence of future treatment needs

The case also involved a commercial driver who was working for a restoration company, requiring careful evaluation of the driver's conduct and the employer connection to the crash.

Documenting the Full Impact

The case was not presented as a simple rear end collision or as a collection of hospital bills. Attorney Rivas documented the full progression of the client's injuries and recovery:

1. 01Emergency removal from the vehicle
2. 02Ambulance transport
3. 03A 12 day hospital stay
4. 04Surgery for a severe left ankle fracture dislocation and extensively comminuted fibula fracture
5. 05Inpatient rehabilitation
6. 06Wheelchair use
7. 07A cast
8. 08A walking boot
9. 09A knee scooter
10. 10Spinal brace restrictions
11. 11Surgical scarring
12. 12A gradual return to weight bearing

The effects of the crash did not end with the client's hospital discharge. Her recovery involved injuries affecting multiple areas of her body, continued symptoms, mobility restrictions, follow up care, and recommendations for additional treatment. Attorney Rivas and the litigation team reviewed and organized the hospital records, surgical documentation, rehabilitation records, follow up care, and provider recommendations to show the full impact of the crash on the client's independence, physical function, recovery, and future needs.

Continued Negotiation During Litigation

The case required ongoing communication and negotiation between the parties while litigation continued. Attorney Rivas continued to develop the liability evidence, medical documentation, future care issues, and the full damages picture so that the case could be evaluated based on the real consequences of the crash.

The negotiations focused on the commercial driver's failure to control speed, the report's indication that distraction may have contributed, the five vehicle crash sequence, the head on impact, the client's emergency treatment, her surgery and rehabilitation, her mobility restrictions, surgical scarring, and the anticipated need for additional medical care.

$600,000 Settlement

The resolution reflected the full circumstances of the case: a commercial driver's failure to control speed, a five vehicle chain reaction, a head on collision, emergency extraction, ambulance transport, a 12 day hospitalization, serious fractures, ankle surgery, inpatient rehabilitation, scarring, mobility restrictions, and documented future medical needs.

See more case results from J. Alexander Law, or learn how the firm handles commercial vehicle crash cases.

Direct Case Experience

Evidence Developed During Representation

Attorney Laura Rivas represented this client through litigation and secured the $600,000 settlement. This case summary is based on evidence developed during that representation, including the certified Texas crash report, crash scene photographs, EMS documentation, hospital records, diagnostic imaging, ankle surgery records, inpatient rehabilitation records, orthopedic follow up records, medical billing, and litigation demand materials.

How the Firm Advanced the Case

The firm's direct experience in this matter came from evaluating the commercial driver's conduct, tracing the five vehicle crash sequence, documenting the emergency and surgical recovery, analyzing the medical and future care evidence, and continuing negotiations throughout litigation until the matter was resolved.

That work allowed Attorney Rivas and the litigation team to present the complete story of the crash: not only the initial rear end impact, but the chain reaction, the head on collision, the emergency extraction, the serious fractures, the surgery and rehabilitation, the mobility restrictions, the scarring, and the ongoing medical consequences.

Attorney Review

Case handled by: Laura Rivas, Senior Associate Attorney

Resolved during litigation

Reviewed by: Josh Alexander, Founder and Managing Attorney

Published: September 24, 2026
Last reviewed: September 24, 2026

Case Result Disclaimer