We Recovered $5,000,000 Through a Wrongful Death Settlement for a Forklift Operator’s Family After a Rack Beam Pinned Him in a Northlake Warehouse
In 2022, a man operating a standup reach forklift at a distribution center in Northlake, Texas was pinned when a lower rack beam entered the open rear of his operator’s compartment. He died in the hospital days later.
Attorney David Trosman handled the forklift accident case for his family. We sued the companies that designed, built, sold and serviced the forklift, and his employer, which also owned and ran the warehouse. The case settled in litigation in 2025, about three years after his death.
A Standup Forklift With an Open Back
A standup reach forklift is built for narrow warehouse aisles. The operator rides standing, in a compartment at the rear of the truck, and on the forklift he was driving the back of that compartment was open.
In 2022, at a distribution center in Northlake, a lower rack beam entered that opening and pinned him. He died in the hospital days later. Many families hear that a death at work is only a workers’ compensation matter. His family hired us to look at all of it.
OSHA Wrote It Down Thirteen Years Earlier
In 2009, OSHA published a safety bulletin on standup forklifts. Covering 1993 through 2008, it reported that “at least nine employees have been killed and three employees sustained severe crushing injuries when operating a standup forklift in reverse.” Describing the machines involved, the bulletin states:
These forklifts did not have a protective rear guard or corner post to prevent under-ride from occurring.
OSHA recommended that employers “Purchase, where appropriate, standup forklifts that have corner posts, extended backrests, rear post guards, or other features to prevent an under-ride from occurring.” It also suggested a curb or a lowest shelf placed so the bottom of the forklift strikes it first. The bulletin is advisory, and in its words it “is not a standard or a regulation, and it creates no new legal obligations.” We used it to show what was known, and it had been published thirteen years before his death.
We Looked Past the Employer to the Machine and the Warehouse
Against the companies that designed, built, sold and maintained the forklift, we brought product liability claims in strict liability and negligence. Texas design defect law, § 82.005, required us to show “there was a safer alternative design” and that the defect “was a producing cause” of the death. We contended that a rear vertical post from the console up to the overhead guard, sometimes called a “third corner” post, would have kept the beam out of the compartment and was “economically and technologically feasible.”
Against his employer, which also owned and ran the warehouse, we claimed negligence in failing to provide a safe workplace. We contended that lower rack beams were set at a height that could enter the operator’s compartment, a danger an operator could not readily see, and that forklifts were supplied without rear posts. Changing the beam height, installing curbs or bollards, or retrofitting rear posts were options.
We also alleged gross negligence against both groups. Those were the family’s claims, and the case settled before a jury decided them.
David Trosman Read the Machine Like the Defense Engineers Do
This was a case for a trial lawyer who understands machines. Each step below was built so the case could go to trial if it had to.
Lead attorneyDavid Trosman, Of Counsel Attorney
David trained as an industrial engineer before law school, and he has more than 100 jury trials behind him in courtrooms across Texas and over 17 years on the Texas bar. He has litigated more than 1,000 cases, and he personally takes on our matters that turn most on engineering and trial work. Read David’s profile
Beyond workers’ compensation
Intake picks up day or night, and each family we take on is assigned a single case manager who checks in no less than once every 14 days. David looked at the forklift, the companies that designed, built, sold and serviced it, and the warehouse itself. Workers’ compensation alone would have left those questions unasked.
Engineering and standards
We gathered the forklift industry’s safety standard, ANSI B56.1, OSHA’s 2009 bulletin and a 2022 forensic engineering paper on the hazard. David held the forklift’s design and the rack layout up against each one.
Medical proof
We obtained the medical examiner’s investigation and autopsy, and a retired county chief medical examiner reviewed them for the case.
What his family lost
Under Chapter 71, the wrongful death action is “for the exclusive benefit of the surviving spouse, children, and parents of the deceased” (§ 71.004(a)), and a personal injury action “survives to and in favor of the heirs, legal representatives, and estate of the injured person” (§ 71.021(b)). An economist’s report measured what the family lost. The firm’s wrongful death page walks through both claims.
Suit, then settlement
The lawsuit was filed in a Dallas County Court at Law. With the evidence built for trial, the case settled in litigation in 2025.
$5,000,000 Recovered for the Family
$5,000,000
Wrongful death and survival claims, resolved in litigation in 2025
The $5,000,000 is a gross amount. Attorney fees and case expenses come out of it before the family receives its portion. His family’s result came from the facts and proof of this case, and it cannot tell another family what their own case will bring.
Attorney Review
Case handled by: David Trosman, Of Counsel Attorney
Licensed in Texas for more than 17 years
Reviewed by: Josh Alexander, Founder and Managing Attorney
Published and reviewed on
More Results for Texas Families
- $15,000,000I-45 truck crash wrongful deathSettled in litigation
- $850,000Pasadena red light crashSettled in litigation
- $600,000Rockwall County five vehicle crashSettled in litigation
- $600,000Mesquite 18 wheeler crashTruck accident settlement
- $325,000Hood County commercial truck crashSettled in litigation
- $175,000Round Rock construction vehicle crashSettled before suit
- $125,000Brownsville armored truck rear endSettled before suit
- $105,000Texas highway unsafe lane changeSettled before suit
- $105,000Three vehicle crash in DallasPolicy limits recovery
- $100,000Rear end, no police reportSettled before suit
- $95,000Midland company truck left turnSettled before suit
- $89,000San Antonio 3 car chain reactionSettled before suit
- $85,000Farmers Branch left turn, UIMSettled in litigation
- $82,500Plano company truck left turnSettled in litigation
- $60,000San Antonio rear end, UIMTwo policy limits, pre litigation
- $50,000Allen rear end crashPolicy limits settlement
- $30,000San Antonio rotator cuff tearPolicy limit, before suit
- $30,000Houston hit and run recoveryUM policy limits
- $30,000Richardson apartment exit crashPolicy limits, pre litigation
Lost Someone in a Workplace
or Forklift Accident?
Call us whenever you are able, in English or Spanish, and walk us through what happened. We will look at both the machine and the workplace, and the attorney fee comes from a recovery or not at all.
No fee unless we recover · Se habla español · Proudly Serving All of Texas
